|
Communication
method based on a standard manual sign system in which the receivers
hand(s) is placed lightly upon the hand(s) of the signer to perceive
the signs.
Purpose
To
make language in the form of manual signs accessible to children who
are deaf and have insufficient vision to access signs visually.
Examples
-
BALL:
Claw hands form ball-shape. Child places his/her hands on
the signers hands.
-
DRINK:
Place right "C" hand in front of the mouth, palm facing
left and make a motion as if taking a drink. Child places his/her
hands on the signers hands and follows the signer's movements.
Considerations
-
Consider the childs ability to place his or her hand(s) on
the signers hand(s) to determine whether tactile signing is
an appropriate method for the childs receptive communication.
-
Consider
the motor complexity of signs and the childs motor ability.
Consult an occupational or physical therapist if the child has physical
impairments.
-
Keep
number of sign movements to a minimum. Modify some signs to make
them easier to detect tactilely. Signs that are "made on the
body" should replace standard signs that are "made in
the air". Signs made with the whole hand may be easier to perceive
tactilely than signs involving finger movements or part of the hand.
Two-handed signs with symmetrical movements are more easily recognized
than asymmetrical ones.
-
Modifications
of standard manual signs used by children who are deaf-blind should
be kept to a minimum, so that they learn standard manual signs and
are able to communicate with sign language users.
-
Some
children will need signs tactilely in some situations but not in
others
(e.g., to follow the fast pace of signing, the child might choose
touch and not vision, or the child may choose to use both depending
on lighting conditions).
- The
use of tactile tracking helps a child with a reduced visual field
to know where the signers hands are in space and where to look.
Tactile tracking involves touching the back of the signers hands
at the wrist.
- Help
the child understand the meaning of signs by signing about what you
are experiencing together (See Mutual
Tactile Attention).
Advantages
-
Children
who are severely visually impaired or who are not visually attentive
can perceive the signs tactilely. Tactile
signs provide a method of symbolic communication.
-
Tactile
signs allow children to interact with those who use standard manual
signs.
Disadvantages
- Comprehension
of tactile signs requires cognitive, tactile, and memory skills.
- Not
all manual signs can be adapted easily to a tactile mode.
- Modification
of sign tactilely may be idiosyncratic and may be only understood
by a few communication partners involved with an individual child.
- Tactile
signs require the receiver to know how to position his or her hand(s)
over the senders hand(s). Therefore, tactile signing may not
be useful for infants and other children because of physical, behavioral
or cognitive abilities that make it difficult for them to actively
obtain information in this manner.
- The
smaller hands of a child may not be able to accurately perceive the
movements of the larger hands of adults that are producing signs.
- Use
of tactile signs may be tiring for the sender because of the weight
and pressure of the receivers hands.
- Tactile
signing interrupts an ongoing activity of the child. For example,
a teacher produces a sign that a child receives tactilely and then
the child begins the activity. To maintain communication, the teacher
interrupts this child to provide sign input that the child receives
tactilely.
- If
tactile signs are not understood by the child, he or she may dislike
this type of physical contact.
Strategies
-
Introduce key word
signs to label communicative behavior that is within the child's repertoire
(e.g., signals, gestures, objects cues). If the child recognizes his/her
spoon as a cue for mealtime, then sign EAT, or if the child rocks
his/her body when the swing stops, then sign MORE SWING.
- Begin
with key word signs that are useful, used frequently, motivating,
easy to make, easy to discriminate, and easily understood by the child.
Determine the motor complexity of sign production and whether they
will be an effective means of communication for a child with physical
disabilities. Consult an occupational or physical therapist if the
child has motor impairments.
-
Create multiple opportunities for the child to associate the sign
with the referent (object, person, activity, or experience) so he
or she can learn the meaning of the sign. Provide opportunities for
the child to generalize the use of signs across activities, settings,
and people.
- Adapt
standard manual signs and adapt their pace of production as needed
so the child can perceive them tactilely. Modify signs to make them
easier to detect tactilely. Keep movements to a minimum. Signs that
are "made on the body" should replace standard signs that are "made
in the air". Signs made with the whole hand may be easier to perceive
tactilely than signs involving finger movements or part of the hand.
Two-handed signs with symmetrical movements are more easily recognized
than asymmetrical ones. However, be selective in adapting standard
manual signs so that children can still communicate with a larger
group of sign users.
- Help
the child understand who is producing the sign and who is receiving
the sign. In tactile signing, the sender produces signs and the receiver
(child) places his or her hand(s) on the sender's hand(s). If the
sender is signing on the child's body then the child is the receiver.
If the communication partner is helping the child to sign coactively,
then the child is producing the sign.
- The
communication partner and child should be positioned so that they
are both comfortable and able to produce and receive signs. Because
the communication partner position may vary in relationship to the
child (i.e., beside the child or in front of the child), he or she
should remember to facilitate the child's access to signed communication.
- Some
children will need signs tactilely in some situations but not in others
(e.g. to follow the fast pace of signing, the child might choose touch
and not vision, or the child may choose to use both depending on lighting
conditions).
- Some
children will need individual support to use their communication system
in a classroom with other students where the teacher cannot convey
information to the child individually.
Source
Tactile
Signing represents a synthesis of information from Project SALUTEs
focus groups, National Advisory Committee, staff activities, and a review
of relevant literature such as the following bibliography.
Click
Here for Examples
Bibliography
Blaha,
R., & Carlson B. (1996). Issues regarding the assessment of vision
loss in regard to sign language and fingerspelling for the student with
deaf-blindness. See/Hear [On-line]. http://www.tsbvi.edu/Outreach/seehear/archive/sign.html.
Chen, D.
(1999). Beginning communication with infants. In D. Chen, (Ed.). Essential
elements in early intervention: Visual impairments and multiple disabilities.
(pp. 337-377). New York: AFB Press.
Chen, D.
(1995). The beginnings of communication: Early childhood. In K.M. Huebner,
J.G. Prickett, T.R.Welch, & E. Joffe (Eds.). Hand in hand: Essentials
of communication and orientation and mobility for your students who
are deaf-blind. (pp. 185-218). New York: AFB Press.
Chen, D.,
Taylor,C., & Cavello,G. (1990). Parents and visually impaired
infants. Learning together. A parent guide to socially based routines
for visually impaired infants. Louisville, KY: American Printing
House for the Blind.
Dunn, M.L.
(1982). Pre-sign language motor skills. Tucson, AZ: Communication
Skill Builders.
Harlin,
D. (1996). Tactile sign. TAC News, 8, 8-11.
Prickett, J.G. (1995)a.
Deafblindness and communication. In K.M. Huebner, J.G. Prickett, T.R.
Welch, & E. Joffe (Eds.). Hand in hand: Essentials of communication
and orientation and mobility for your students who are deaf-blind.
(pp. 261-288). New York: AFB Press.
Prickett,
J.G. (1995)b. Manual and spoken language. In K.M. Huebner, J.G. Prickett,
T.R. Welch, & E. Joffe (Eds.). Hand in hand: Essentials of communication
and orientation and mobility for your students who are deaf-blind.
(pp. 261-287). New York: AFB Press.
Reed, C.M.,
Delhorne, L.A., Durlach, N.I., & Fischer S.D. (1995). A study of
the tactual reception of sign language. Journal of Speech and Hearing
Research, 38 477-489.
Miles, B.,
& Riggio, M. (Eds.). (1999). Remarkable conversations. A guide to
developing meaningful conversations with children and young adults who
are deaf-blind. Watertown, MA: Perkins School for the Blind.
SKI*HI Institute.
(1993). Tactile Signing Project: Tactile Interactive Signing and
Primitive Signaling (Project TIPS). [Video]. Logan, UT: Utah State
University, Department of Communicative Disorders.
Thestrup,
A., & Andersen, O.V. (1994). Modified sign language for congenitally
deaf-blind people: Ann Thestrup and Ove Vedel Andersen report on developments
in Denmark. Deaf-Blind Education, 13, 16-17.
|